[Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

[Alexander Todorov]

На 17.09.2015 в 06:28, Jerry James написа:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Alexander Todorov <atodorov at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Please let me know which packages need to genuinely be excluded and what
>> should we do with these packages ? Some will probably be fixed once they are
>> rebuilt but that may take a while.
>
> Some language environments provide their own memory managers that
> don't take kindly to address randomization, such as:
> - gcl
> - polyml
> - xemacs

Hi Jerry,
how about other offenses like "No PIE" or "No canary found" ?

xemacs and polyml appear to have files with both good and bad values.


--
Alex