[Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Thu Sep 17 11:08:29 UTC 2015
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:03:51PM +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> На 17.09.2015 в 12:26, Richard W.M. Jones написа:
> >>As far as I can see most of them report "Partial RELRO" which may
> >>well be fixed as you propose below. If not I can easily exclude
> >>them.
> >
> >They're intermediate files used by developers. They aren't runnable
> >binaries. I think everything in %{libdir}/ocaml should be ignored.
> >
>
>
> I see .o files, .so files and some .cmxs ones. Should all of them be ignored then ?
Yes. Everything under here is for developers. The .so files would
only be run under the bytecode interpreter, and Fedora only builds
those for the benefit of developers.
All Fedora-shipped OCaml applications should use native code, and go
in /usr/bin.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
More information about the devel
mailing list