F22: Software for update

Eric Griffith egriffith92 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 04:40:24 UTC 2015


On Sep 30, 2015 12:22 AM, "Ben Boeckel" <mathstuf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Sep, 2015 at 17:08:17 GMT, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > update system-- yum never downloaded the packages as part of the check,
DNF
> > doesn't, App Store / Play Store don't download as part of a check,
Windows
> > Update doesn't
>
> That's not exactly true anymore for Windows.
>
>
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/09/microsoft-is-downloading-windows-10-to-pcs-even-if-you-dont-reserve-a-copy/
>

Trust me, I know, I'm the one who gets to fix crap like that.. Or, in this
case, pretend to when infront of end users.

But that's just happening, there's no user interaction. The user isnt
waiting on it. Software, on the other hand, is being asked "Hey can you
check for updates?" And then not displaying the feedback the user was
expecting until its checked, and downloaded anywhere between 1kb and 2gb of
data (my largest post install update). That could be relatively quick, or a
really long time depending on the amount being downloaded and user's
bandwidth. The entire time the user is sitting there twiddling their thumbs
because they don't know what's actually happening and end up just writing
off Software as being slow.

Plus, as someone above pointed out, even non-cellular ISPs sometimes have
metering. Microsoft's under fire for burning through metered connections
due to automatic updates / upgrades, Apple is under fire for the same thing
because of opt-out WiFi Assist in the new iOS, how about we -not- join that
club?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150930/df6a3a82/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list