[uefi-secure-boot-guide] master: Fix a minor gramatical problem. (4d18f67)

sparks at fedoraproject.org sparks at fedoraproject.org
Fri Mar 1 02:37:41 UTC 2013


Repository : http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=docs/uefi-secure-boot-guide.git

On branch  : master

>---------------------------------------------------------------

commit 4d18f6767a9b73b9919c0f47fbddacf55ae61c8d
Author: Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 27 15:12:15 2013 -0500

    Fix a minor gramatical problem.
    
    Subject and verb plurality should match.
    
    Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: Eric Christensen <sparks at redhat.com>


>---------------------------------------------------------------

 en-US/What_is_Secure_Boot.xml |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/en-US/What_is_Secure_Boot.xml b/en-US/What_is_Secure_Boot.xml
index 9dfc8a3..2cb46da 100644
--- a/en-US/What_is_Secure_Boot.xml
+++ b/en-US/What_is_Secure_Boot.xml
@@ -482,8 +482,8 @@ see <xref linkend="sect-UEFI_Secure_Boot_Guide-What_is_Secure_Boot-Microsoft_Imp
 into the kernel.  Verification happens before loading kernel modules,
 but it does not extend to user space applications.  We can be certain
 that no unsigned executable code is present until the initial ramdisk
-(initrd) is loaded. Since initrd contents is not cryptographically
-signed and contains executable code, booting a signed &PRODUCT; boot
+(initrd) is loaded. Since initrd contents are not cryptographically
+signed and contain executable code, booting a signed &PRODUCT; boot
 loader can eventually lead to arbitrary effects.
 </para>
 <para>



More information about the docs-commits mailing list