Documentation project status
dpawson at nildram.co.uk
Mon Dec 29 18:16:08 UTC 2003
At 16:32 29/12/2003, Edward C. Bailey wrote:
>The documentation produced by Red Hat for Red Hat Linux is a different
>story. The intent was never to make the documentation open source --
>you'll note that the SGML files (or the LaTeX files for the earlier
>releases) used to create the manuals are not made available. The original
>thinking was that the documentation was (to use corporate-speak) a
>And that was that. To be honest, we didn't give the matter all that much
>thought -- we figured that copyright would be sufficient.
Please tell your bosses I think they are a bunch of merchant bankers.
If that's what they want from Fedora, then up their respectives.
Is this what they expected for Fedora?
'open source' but get your own documentation?
I guess slashdot is a good market for such a message Edward?
Give the 'managers' (they want sacking) the press they deserve?
More information about the docs