Fedora DTD?

[Tommy Reynolds]

Uttered Thomas Jones <admin at buddhalinux.com>, spake thus:

> I have quickly built up a DTD Driver for the Docbook 4.2 release. This driver 
> contains declarations for Fedora Core specific documentation. 

I am not in favor of this subsetting (even if it's a proper subset)
approach.  What we have is already rigorously documented in several
books at Borders, Barnes & Noble, Books-A-Million, Amazon, et. al.,
hope I didn't leave out your favorite; if I'd remembered it I would
have plugged it.

An "approved subset" would be yet another learning level for newbies.
I'd much rather see our current Documentation Guide fully-fleshed out
with recommended (or at least tested) examples for the
monkey-see-monkey-document crowd.  No slur intended, but it's really
much easier to bang out a DocBook document with minimal learning
curve by just looking at an example of what you want to do; no
"internalized learning" required.

That's just my $2e+23 opinion.

Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050823/6e679161/attachment.bin