f.r.c organization

[Tommy Reynolds]

Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:

> I could see this as a good way to organize:
> docs/
>   selinux-faq/
>     fc2/
>       index.php ...
>     fc3/
>     fc4/
>   jargon-buster/
>   release-notes/
>     fc3/
>     fc4/
>   ...
> 
> The only glitch I see is that moving directory names around is a CVS
> nightmare, so the initial conversion will be ugly on the commits list.
> Does anyone see other problems with this standard?  

Why do CVS moves come into this at all?  You're not talking about
reorganizing the fdp CVS repository to mimic the deliverable layout
are you?

Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050713/6ce365d7/attachment.bin