f.r.c organization

[Karsten Wade]

On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:14 -0400, Elliot Lee wrote:
> A lot of this discussion about organization is a bit pointless. Remember,
> to the user browsing around, the pages are connected in a WEB, not a TREE,
> so trying to figure out what directory structure to use is not worth a
> discussion - someone needs to pick a directory structure and go with it.
> 
> The issue that does deserve collective attention is making sure that each
> page has appropriate links to build the right navigational structure for
> users. The filesystem directory structure only affects the web structure
> if you let it :-)

D'oh!  You know, I was thinking about that yesterday and forgot that it
applied. :)

Although, a nice directory structured does help in making sense to
people.  I'd do it with symlinks, if we could check those in.  Having
the underlying tree follow different conventions is confusing to
maintainers and URL readers.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050713/ed36c2e8/attachment.bin