web/html/docs/release-notes index.php,1.5,1.6

[Karsten Wade]

On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 12:34 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:

> I wonder what the chances are of having the release-notes errata rolled
> into a fedora-release update?  Note that the fedora-maintainers list is
> now tossing around the idea[1] of producing an update to allow for a
> script to do a "rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY*".  I don't
> think we should lobby for doing this with every relnotes erratum, but
> certainly with the addition of the big section on legally encumbered
> material, it would be worth our while to piggyback there?

We were discussing this with Elliot the other day.  We have a fedora-
release update in QA, aiui.  We want to get a latest version in any
update of fedora-release.  If we can close most of the bugs, I'll ask
Elliot to include a build in the next fedora-release update for FC4.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050726/2ebc0631/attachment.bin