CSS for HTML output

[Paul W. Frields]

On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 06:02 -0500, Thomas Jones wrote:
> On Friday 29 July 2005 16:23, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Isn't the color system and/or browser *dependent*?  In other words, the
> > links are colored exactly the way any generic link is colored for the
> > end user, meaning they don't see anything they don't recognize.
> > However, I'm not against changing them, as long as we (a) agree on what
> > sticks out without sticking out TOO much, and (b) it is nicely
> > Fedora-like.
> 
> Oops...you are right. ;) The "generic" link is inherently capable of being 
> different on every node. Which brings to light the issue of fedora-like 
> representation to the end-user.
> 
> I like what yourself and Karsten have done with the new scheme. I personally 
> would think that some colors that promote a fedora-like visual appearance 
> would be great. The accepted standard of blue/purple are a safe bet. But then 
> again another selection from you/Karsten may provide more cohesion with the 
> new scheme.

I made another change to the heading color and link colors, this time to
be more adherent to the official web site.  I think you'll like the
results!  Please check the mockup at:

http://docs.frields.org/mirror-tutorial-en/sn-planning-and-setup.html

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050729/df24b1b5/attachment.bin