[Fwd: Re: Cannot get mock to work]

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 12:21 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:
> 
> >  I figured a *developer* type would have more
> > experience with mock and how it works, and thus be able to more quickly
> > generate the required documentation.  Can you help with this?
> 
> Dunno, I'm buried in coding-for-dollars at the moment.  Maybe Seth
> could squirt me a copy of 0.4 that I could look at and render a final
> answer.  Or just letting me know how 0.4 differs from 0.3 might be enough.

Anybody who's interested in helping can simply download it from the
development repo.  (Ah, the beauty of open development.)  I don't want
to put any further words in Seth's mouth, but if he doesn't have time to
write the docs himself, he probably doesn't have time to do a lot of
explaining either.  ;-)

If you don't have time, don't worry about it.  When our units at work
had to respond to all-hands canvassing, we had a phrase appended to most
of them that said "Positive responses only."  This is kind of like that.
If anyone out there definitely has time to help, please pipe up.  If
not, no sweat.  :-)

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050731/84eb6055/attachment.bin