Saxon?

[Tim Waugh]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 05:05:43PM -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:

> Uttered Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat.com>, spake thus:
> 
> > Maybe we should be looking at xmlroff, which doesn't have a dependency
> > on *yet another* XML parser
> 
> Xmlroff just doesn't work at all yet.  Try converting the IG, for instance.
> 
> At least these saxon/fop partially function.

It's unfair to say it doesn't work at all, but it certainly isn't
something that will work for everything right now, that's true.

But I do really question the benefit of switching xmlto to using
Saxon.  We should be concentrating effort on the XSL-FO -> PDF step,
not the XML -> XSL-FO step which already works perfectly well.

Tim.
*/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050617/796c47d1/attachment.bin