package diff between FC4 and FC3

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 10:53 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:52:00 -0800, "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com>
> said:
> > If anyone has time to replace the cruft at:
> > 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraDocs_2fRelNotes_2fCore4Test1RelNotes
> > 
> > with this:
> 
> Just so that you know - 
> 
> I'm at work so won't be able to do anything for most of today.  I'll
> probably be on IRC/mail from about 7.30pm (GMT) today.
> 
> So far I've gone through the text and tidied up indents and line breaks.
> 
> One issue that has popped up:  The import lost the admonition (Note and
> Warning sections) formatting so that these became regular paragraphs.

I did lots of tweaks to the release notes today, and if I am convinced
of anything it is that a Wiki is not a nice place to edit a very long
document.

I've been convinced today by others that our best bet is to find a way
to insert just a little extra process into developers existing
workflow.

I don't want to give up the hard work that Ed did to get developers to
give relnotes the love they need.  But I don't think asking anyone to
edit the Wiki is a good idea.

For test1, we can use the Wiki to supplement the release notes, just to
cover the gap of a missing release notes.  We can continue discussing
the best approach for test2.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
              Learn, Network and Experience Open Source.             
Red Hat Summit, New Orleans 2005   http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20050315/47835223/attachment.bin