Test of Docs Packaging
James Laska
jlaska at redhat.com
Fri Oct 14 17:48:55 UTC 2005
/me watches as imap comes back to life ;(
My apologies for the spam,
James Laska
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 12:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 09:27 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> > 2. The "noarch" RPM's actually contain the source; that's more a
> > "src.rpm" or "-devel.noarch.rpm" to me. Don't we need room in the
> > namespace for a PDF / HTML flavor of the RPM? Perhaps
> > "foo-html.noarch.rpm"?
>
> Any objections to having the rpm contain all flavors? Seems like less
> hassle with that approach. But we could benefit from standardizing on
> the location of how those files get dropped onto the system.
>
> How about the following:
>
> /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang/ # chunked html
> /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang.html # nochunk html
> /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang.pdf # pdf
> /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang.txt # plain txt
> /usr/share/fedora/doc/$docbase/$lang/$docbase-$lang.omf (perhaps a
> symlink from /usr/share/omf or vice-versa)
>
> Thanks,
> James Laska
>
> --
> ==========================================
> James Laska -- jlaska at redhat.com
> Quality Engineering -- Red Hat, Inc.
> ==========================================
More information about the docs
mailing list