Test of Docs Packaging

[Tommy Reynolds]

Uttered James Laska <jlaska at redhat.com>, spake thus:

> The first issue was how to handle CVS versus packaging.  By that I mean
> when working out of CVS, you are expected to have a path
> "../docs-common/" that resolves.  That isn't necessarily true when
> working out of the archive (tarball) or the rpm.  

I don't envision the tarballs nor the RPM's to be used in the
authoring process.  I think we want the authors working in the CVS
arena and use the RPM/tarball as a distribution method for the
finished goods.  Read that as "end-user".

However, I like the idea of the RPM/tarball packaging process to
include the CSS and stylesheet images in the fedora-doc-common RPM.
Do you or Paul want to do the surgery?  We already browse the DOM for
info...

Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20051014/664af3d1/attachment.bin