Test of Docs Packaging

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 15:41 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Could someone (Paul?) please clarify who is supposed to be using
> what?  I confess to active avoidance of all things GUI, so I may not
> be clear on the purpose of these RPM's in association with YELP and all
> that.  Does it do the XML rendering on the fly, or something?  If
> not, why put XML in the RPM's at all?

While it is true that Yelp does display XML, the real point is that XML
is not just for source breakfast anymore.  It is a full-fledged
distributed meal in its own right.

Which brings up the point ... we will have identical XML in .src.rpm as
well as docs .rpms.  Hmmm ...

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20051019/d66a7f7f/attachment.bin