Fedora FAQs in Docs?

[Karsten Wade]

On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 08:46 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:

> If we want separate PO, a separate module would be preferable.  We can
> have fedora-release-notes Requires: fedora-faq if we want to package it
> separately.  If we want to just package them together, one PO only is
> probably the name of the game.

We just decided in the FDSCo meeting to do the FAQ as a separate
package.

Doing this, we can release updates, so even if the on-disk version is a
few months out of date, it suggests you immediately update itself. :)

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20060808/6d29496f/attachment.bin