Tommy.Reynolds at MegaCoder.com
Wed Jan 18 17:18:32 UTC 2006
Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>, spake thus:
> re: Commit below --
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 18:04 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Dates must be in ctime(3) format, not ISO format.
> > TODO: We need an XSL magic to translate the dates if they have dashes.
I added the "fdpsh" command "iso2date YYYY-MM-DD" or "iso2date today"
to make this easier.
> The "make clog" target takes care of this automatically. I would
> recommend folks using that target whenever possible since it minimizes
> hassle. If you edit manually, well, just respect the normal rules for
> such things. If you break the revision's @date attribute, the rpmbuild
> process will tell you what you did wrong (i.e. %changelog date is not in
> proper format).
All dates in the "rpm-info.xml" file should be in the ctime(3)
format, instead of some as ISO and others not. We just don't really
care about the revision date on the doc. Yet.
> Since no one will be creating rpm-info.xml files that have any RPM
> revisions yet, there shouldn't be any cruft to worry about.
Well, I'm testing the RPM build structure on a second document ;-)
I'm not really sure how this "rpm-info.xml" was produced, though.
As you say, no need to worry. In fact, I only worry about those
things which I control: therefore, I never worry about anything.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20060118/526a525e/attachment.bin
More information about the docs