Reference for XIncludes
kwade at redhat.com
Mon Jan 30 15:08:41 UTC 2006
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 18:22 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com>, spake thus:
> > > If I read the signs aright, the
> > > http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude
> > > namespace has been depreciated in favor of the
> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude
> > > namespace.
> > > Is that correct?
> > That is how I read it from this page:
> > http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/ModularDoc.html
> Gack. A real case of YMMV, I guess.
> It's a pity that the DocBook DTD won't let you put the xmlns:xi="..."
> declaration just anywhere. Requiring that whole <xi:include
> href="..." xmlns:xi="..."/> declaration every time is clumsy.
> Oh, well, these things happen.
Not only that, but ... doesn't this make it impossible to validate or
build the document when unable to reach that URI?
We might make it a policy of using a copy of the 2001/XInclude within
docs-common/common. I don't see a local copy of it within Fedora.
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Content Services Fedora Documentation Project
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20060130/f08edfa1/attachment.bin
More information about the docs