election calendar [RFC]
couf at skynet.be
Mon Dec 3 20:39:02 UTC 2007
Op maandag 03-12-2007 om 12:27 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Karsten
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:39 +0100, Bart Couvreur wrote:
> > One thing, I'm wondering about: do we really need 7 people aboard FDSCo?
> > Looking at the attendees to meetings the last couple of months, we've
> > done about almost everything with 4-5 max.
> Starting from this discussion on IRC, I think we do still need enough
> people to cover when others are not available. Otherwise, sure, it
> could all be done with a minimally sized leadership.
> However, I don't think we can so easily change these details at this
> point. The reason we have a review of these details/policies *after*
> the election is to be fair and equitable:
> * The three seats up for (re)election would reduce get reduced to "one",
> which is not encouraging for potential nominees.
> * Electing three people now is for a twelve month term, but after the
> elections the new FDSCo could vote to shorten that term to six months
> and hold elections for a new, smaller body in May.
> * Mainly, we said we would follow this pattern and switching this late
> is not a good time to switch; wisely, the previous FDSCo created the
> trigger to discuss changes to the policy for *after* this election, just
> to avoid (the appearance of) election improprieties.
> Thus, I think the entire policy is up for discussion after the election,
> including how long all active seats are held, etc.
> - Karsten
Fair play, just something we need to keep in mind later on.
Bart <couf at fedoraproject.org> <couf at skynet.be>
key fingerprint: 6AAB 544D 3432 D013 776D 3602 ADB6 6B2A D93F 0F93
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20071203/4680c457/attachment.bin
More information about the docs