NSA guide to securing Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 00:14:57 UTC 2007
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 14:45 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 00:27 +1300, Vladimir Kosovac wrote:
> > This is pretty comprehensive doc but mostly directed at 'best-practice'
> > from the security point of view. As such it would work the best as an
> > add-on reading to admin guide.
> +1 Definitely in the references and further reading section. I've
> already heard Linux security experts call it a best-in-class guide, and
> it appears to be generic enough to apply to any Fedora-like derivative.
> Great for admins and writers of admin content :) to learn from.
Typically first-class work from the NSA as usual.
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20071209/acd7b8b2/attachment.bin
More information about the docs