kwade at redhat.com
Thu Dec 20 22:47:23 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:11 +1000, Malcolm Jacobson wrote:
> Speaking strictly as an interested observer, can anyone explain why
> Fedora Docs doesn't use the same license and sign up process as
While we cannot use the GNU FDL as Wikipedia does (see below for
background), we certainly can allow a simpler process to get
contributors on the wiki. A click-through CLA (read, then click "OK, I
agree") is sufficient, but not enabled in our version of Moin Moin.
Resolving this should be a higher priority. We're challenged by a
release process not our own.
Let's ask Mike (under a new thread) about what it would take to
> John Babich wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 2007 2:07 PM, John Babich <jmbabich at gmail.com> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > I plan to be at the FUDCon and I'll post a session now on "Simplifying
> > > the Onboarding Process for the Fedora Project" or something similar.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I'm the best guy to lead it though. Red Hat Legal should
> > > definitely be involved in the discussion at FUDCon.
> > >
> > Done. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnBabich/SimplifyingOnboarding.
> > Best Regards,
> > John Babich
> > Volunteer, Fedora Project
> fedora-docs-list mailing list
> fedora-docs-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20071220/b186f2b7/attachment.bin
More information about the docs