DocsProject wikispace reorganization [RFC]
Bart Couvreur
couf at skynet.be
Sat Mar 3 18:19:50 UTC 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Paul W. Frields schreef:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 19:58 +0100, Bart Couvreur wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> So here's a reorganization proposal:
>>
>> DocsProject/
>> |-- Join
>> | |--Writer
>> | |--Editor
>> | \--Translator
>> |-- Goals / Mission
>> |-- Schedule
>> | \--some pages with details (e.g. specific schedules on DUG, IG)
>> |-- Tasks (considering all FDP related tasks and processes)
>> | |--Guides
>> | |--Relnotes
>> | |--Browser splash page
>> | |--Plone
>> | |--Ideas-page
>> | \--Release announcement (not sure if we should do this)
>> |-- FDSCo (or steering committee)
>> | |--Charter
>> | |--Meeting minutes
>> | |--Elections
>> | |--Nominations
>> | \--Task Schedule
>> \-- Workflow
>> |--Docbook (how to write + intro)
>> |--CVS (usage)
>> |--Wiki (how to write)
>> |--Publishing (web, PDF?)
>> \--Tools
>>
>> And some general ideas:
>> a) Create a default template for all Docs-related pages on the wiki
>> (breadcrumb, default header, ...) to create a common look-and-feel
>> b) Move everything in /Docs/Drafts to DocsProject/Drafts so users know
>> that everything in /Docs is published documentation.
>>
>> As I said, it's all just an idea / proposal. Comments?
>
> As an exercise in -- I don't know, hubris? ignorance? -- I'm going to
> look at this list and make sugggestions, *completely blind* to the
> actual content of the current wiki.
Yeah, that's the actual reason of the exercise, find out what works best
without looking into what we have now.
> 1. Goals/Mission should be combined, cut down to a single concise
> paragraph or list, and appear on the front page.
+1
>
> 2. The FDSCo/TaskSchedule stuff should be moved under the Schedule/
> namespace. Everyone can work on these tasks, not just FDSCo members,
> and both the Publication Schedule and the DocTools Schedule should be
> linked or transcluded on the main schedule page.
True, this is the reason that I added some 'schedule-details' pages to
the idea-tree.
>
> 3. The Workflow pages are a great asset and should relieve the
> Documentation Guide of some of its content. I think Karsten was in
> agreement with this point, since we worked on that some at FUDCon.
Good idea.
>
> 4. The browser splash page now exists, and there's probably no need to
> document it on the wiki -- we can use Bugzilla for RFE's or to track
> problems and to-do's.
Bugzilla could be workable, but it's easier for externals to the project
to add ideas to a wiki-page, imo. Dimitris what's your point of view
about this?
>
> 5. There should perhaps be a Join item for Toolchain Builder.
>
> That's all I have. This is a great goal and I would love to see people
> start cobbling on this stuff ASAP once we have buy-in from enough
> contributors. Bart, I think you just elected yourself point-man! :-)
Don't shoot the point-man! Sure, I'm willing to spearhead the effort :-)
Bart
- --
Bart <couf at fedoraproject.org> <couf at skynet.be>
key fingerprint: 6AAB 544D 3432 D013 776D 3602 ADB6 6B2A D93F 0F93
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF6bxGrbZrKtk/D5MRAt4QAJ9ddZB5D4mN86o6gaUtlSAs/V6Q6QCdES41
I7z8qMgPCLZYReDKuXUt4G4=
=Zxia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the docs
mailing list