CMS Option: Zikula
Gayathri Swaminathan
gayathri.swa at gmail.com
Sun Jan 25 16:22:46 UTC 2009
Hi:
> I think we should also be considering the other major players in the
> CMS game, if there are people available to deploy and maintain them.
> Drupal and Joomla! immediately come to mind, the latter especially
> because it actually has some DocBook XML support. Features aren't
> particularly compelling, though, if we have no one around to help with
> the maintenance.
+1 to your statement regarding maintenance. There are too many choices
for CMS under three major platforms PHP, Python, JAVA, Ruby on rails
etc., Enlisting some here that I have supported/ maintained:
1. JAVA based
Apache Jackrabbit, Liferay
2. Python based
Plone, Django framework
3. PHP based
Mediawiki, Drupal, Wordpress, Joomla
As Paul mentions, each of these CMS come with their own "features"/
"necessity for extension" which of course is based on what we need as
a group as in, how to:
- structure content - can be viewed from maintenance (or) usability perspective
- involve volunteers
- customize the framework
- maintain
- volunteer base and their associated knowledge of choice of platform
- localization concerns
Am still catching up on all IRC logs/ email archives so some of the
listed were perhaps already reviewed and addressed :)
>
> None of this has any bearing on the quality of Zikula, which I'm sure
> is excellent.
Zikula looks cool indeed.
--
Gayathri Swaminathan
gpgkey: 3EFB3D39
Volunteer, FDP
More information about the docs
mailing list