Publican Issues

[Joshua Wulf]

Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Christopher Curran wrote:
>   
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>     
>>> Jeff Fearn wrote:
>>>  
>>>       
>>>>>> 3. Get the Packaging Committee to amend the rules
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>> Good luck getting the blind to see.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> We as a community need to show more respect for each other. Even if you
>>> disagree with something, this is not the way to go about resolving it.
>>>
>>> Rahul
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Being a roadblock is not resolving it either. There is working with
>> developers and there is actively working against them. Respect is earnt,
>> not given to the wanting.
>>
>>     
> Considering that I don't even know what the problem is and no one who's
> swinging the hate bat has yet to clarify that on this list or the
> packaging list (where everyone in the FPC will see it rather than just
> the one randomly subscribed to this list.)  It's hard to see how I can
> act as a very effective roadblock.
>
> One note, though: while the FPC tries to implement goals in a way that's
> as easy as possible for the developers involved, the goals themselves
> are primarily about getting high quality packages to end-users, not
> making developers lives easier.  If you have a suggestion for
> implementing a goal in a way that is easier for packagers, by all means
> make it.  If you just want to complain about how doing things the right
> way takes time then you're going to find your complaints get no respect.
>   Respect, after all, is earned.
>
> -Toshio
>
>   
I think that Jeff and Chris are referring to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471

and possibly this as well:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482972

Josh

-- 
Joshua J Wulf
Engineering Content Services
Red Hat Asia Pacific

eml: jwulf at redhat.com
tel: +61 (0)7 3514 8140
mob: +61 (0)431 929 675
tmz: GMT +10

(0) - omit when dialling internationally