Wikipedia license change
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Tue May 26 19:45:31 UTC 2009
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:05:54AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/27/2009 12:00 AM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> The OPL has served us very well for a long time, I'm sad to see us
> >> move from it, but at this point the writing is clear. We gain a lot
> >> by going with a proper CC license.
> >>
> > Pardon my noobness, but what is it that we gain? I don't have any
> > objections to changing per se, but I'd like to know what the argument
> > is before I support it. :-)
>
> Discussions starting at
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2009-April/msg00061.html
>
> Short version: CC BY SA is a much more widely used license allowing for
> more sharing of content and it is better known and understood as well.
Let's make sure we keep our various legal minds roped in. I know that
Spot mentioned Red Hat Legal may be very much in favor of going with
CC BY-SA, so that may a problem solved before we had it. :-)
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
More information about the docs
mailing list