Docs Meeting Log 2009-09-10

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:59:14PM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Bewley" 
> <dlbewley at lib.ucdavis.edu>
> To: "For participants of the Documentation Project"  
> <fedora-docs-list at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 8:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Docs Meeting Log 2009-09-10
>
>
>> I would suggest that we list the package delta from f11 release date and
>> f12. Not from current f11-updates and f12.
>
> I've convinced myself both ways on this.  I think Paul prefers the 
> latter, so I've avoided tinking about it too hard.  I have, however, 
> saved a primary.sqlite from the F11 release.  I had actually considered a 
> table of changes, perhaps on the wiki, from F11 GA to F11 current.  I see 
> the need for both.

In terms of the release notes, really the best delta is F11 GA -> F12
GA.  A significant portion of F11 updates come from work done on the
F12 branch.  If the delta we focus on is from F11 updates -> F12, we'd
lose the sense that each forward-looking release cycle is contributing
so heavily to advancement.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug