[Bug 533737] Recommend changing the Feedback statement to include the component name.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533737

Ruediger Landmann <rlandman at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DEFERRED

--- Comment #3 from Ruediger Landmann <rlandman at redhat.com> 2010-01-21 09:26:58 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Although to get a component in Fedora Documentation's BZ
> product is fairly easy, just ask me for one and I make it happen.    

Yeah; and if a document doesn't have a Bugzilla component, maybe it shouldn't
point readers to Bugzilla for feedback?

However, I'm more concerned about this on a pragmatic level, because changing
this will require attention from a lot of ranslators -- we have this file
complete in around 40 languages!

On that basis alone, I'm closing this DEFERRED for now, but will revisit it
when we next need L10N to look at Publican's common content (which will be
sometime after the Transifex upgrade).

Cheers

Rudi

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.