CMS

Eric "Sparks" Christensen sparks at fedoraproject.org
Thu Jun 3 22:38:17 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/03/2010 05:13 PM, Zach Oglesby wrote:
> While looking at bugs assigned to the Docs team a saw at least 3 bugs
> that talked about Publican being a temp solution. It seems that at
> least a few people outside of Docs are not that happy with what
> Publican provides.

Can you give us the bug numbers because I'm not sure that I've seen the
tickets.  I know of a couple of implementation bugs that are being
worked right now but they didn't give me heartburn over keeping Publican.

- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=bPbI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the docs mailing list