Changes needed in the development of the RNs

[Eric "Sparks" Christensen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

First, let me say what an awesome job John (jjmcd) and others have been
doing on the Release Notes.  We continue to get kudos from the readers
out there, which is most awesome.

Earlier today we did get a bit of "I wish I could have seen X in your
RNs"[1].  The requester's problem is not that we didn't talk about the
new backup solution but rather we didn't talk about the fact that the
old solution went away.

What I envision is a categorical representation of changes.  This means,
in this case, that the default backup solution for Fedora changed.  We
should not only document the change but also talk about what's going to
happen to the previous default and maybe a migration path.

This is going to take better communication with developers and probably
RELENG.  I'm open to ideas, though!


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600249

- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMCRJrAAoJEDbiLlqcYamxBwAP/itpakCFuebz6lrR8eCTeKsy
x73p07J+nSbs2Iwi6vn3rzMZXT/uSWOgKB8GrNKDZlfuX0Q8hmBUwrqe8Mpdg0fz
6Bi7oMSW8gnyo98U+1hpzYApDgoHp4MuMSxG7wuwrXVZAGQY1YPKr29YM7S+02A5
JLvVNwjBQFNTHxE1cmmPN7DHokd2Mz02ytNBtDH66E4lCdb4Tux+0vopDnCuGqqr
hJmNm5Np+8wLxtvjpM7W+QCuI5ypvo6wx+muSqXyzfwJsH8rVWJs8ZXJBWBNO5Xr
R1oFDyraWOxZ9hfJYx4quHV1R7urxSZV2oTKqIDYu9fEsoKDPKXE7wXar/SdXVxD
2XgYfeoIM+u5PgABz5dnWDmYpAEetC59+YbrYz1ImGQSX57FI9558WHSfjuOE9gf
z1XkWtz9MPMYFdOkHyyMOJ43P1M5KG7wLsytY+cvXPwm//v1mFsHJ4H8fk2yDjBL
cLwcfkeC7DCXabWBGwbMLoqRawRXhtyZNEYD3gc9rP/Wp6dliR+ESB2NCJqov5fm
3b49PMmWvHB8nySvl8BpzUoTXhg1sF9d/h/6+uUEhnhoBU8u/xdDJH1ZITbhXweT
bMmiBQg5AmutVCNeRUcXnOzum3OFQUd+3bvfdnzD++P5nW1ZsA6S/LFM/UUEbu0Y
bLsOOrA3gWWtd8h89Kwn
=Mk0Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----