QA Process

Ben Cotton bcotton at
Wed Nov 24 14:04:41 UTC 2010

I'm a little bit torn on this, so I'll think aloud on list since I
won't be able to be at tonight's meeting...

For externally-reported bugs, BZ is the way to go.  The patch, no
matter who provides it, should be QA'ed before going into the repo.

For new (or newish content), e.g. a new chapter in a guide, I'm less
thrilled about tossing a huge patch or series of patches into a BZ
ticket.  There needs to be some kind of process, but I don't know what
that should look like.

At any rate, whatever process we develop for QA is better than what
we've got now.

Ben Cotton

More information about the docs mailing list