Installation guide - ISO media and USB clarification

James Laska jlaska at redhat.com
Wed Sep 29 16:17:13 UTC 2010


Greetings folks,

Based on an issue discovered during Fedora 14 Beta testing, the Fedora
QA team is currently discussing how best to address gaps in our test
matrix [1].  The specific bug [2] potentially concerns using the
livecd-iso-to-disk command to write ISO media other than the Live image
to a USB drive.

From looking at the Fedora 13 installation guide, it recommends using
the Live.iso and ...
      * liveusb-creator on Windows [3]
      * liveusb-creator, livecd-iso-to-disk or dd on Linux [4]

Later in the guide, it recommends using the boot.iso and ...
      * livecd-iso-to-disk on Linux [5]

Does anyone know why that last bullet recommends using the boot.iso
instead of the Live.iso?  I'm trying to reconcile what is documented and
what is supported by the livecd-tools package.  This mail is intended to
cover the documentation.

Thanks,
James

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/134
[2] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/627789
[3]
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media.html#Making_USB_Media-Windows
[4]
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media-UNIX_Linux.html
[5]
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html-single/Installation_Guide/index.html#sect-New_Users-Alternative_Boot_Methods
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20100929/bdbbb782/attachment.bin 


More information about the docs mailing list