Docs QA procedure

Eric H. Christensen sparks at fedoraproject.org
Sat Dec 31 18:34:26 UTC 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 12:00:59PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> At the last meeting, we seemed to come to an agreement on the
> procedure. I've captured the refinements we discussed[0], Please point
> out any glaring flawsyou see. Let's use this procedure for the F17
> cycle and then we can see where we need to improve the process.
> 
> [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_QA_Procedure

Not sure if this has happened yet or not but should I/someone change *all* BZ components to use Docs-QA for the default QA contact?  What about existing tickets?  I can do this without too much trouble if needed.

- -- Eric

- --------------------------------------------------
Eric H Christensen        eric at christensenplace.us
"Sparks"                  sparks at fedoraproject.org
   .... .. .-.. .-.. ---   .-- --- .-. .-.. -..
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2  E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
- --------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=3XXJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the docs mailing list