Please tutor a crash course on Docs Project tools & workflow.

[Zach Oglesby]

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Christopher Antila
<crantila at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> As a more general observation, I wonder if a stronger QA ("Quality
> Assurance") process would help with this problem. I know that some
> Guides have QA contacts, but for others Bugzilla simply gives this
> mailing list, and some (like the Musicians' Guide) have no QA contact
> whatsoever. Lack of an active QA process means that, if a contributor
> makes a mistake, it won't be noticed until after release - and that's
> understandably intimidating.

This is something that I need to reengage, we need to have a process
in place for QA and we have yet to hammer that out. I hope to have
something done in the next few weeks, so that for F15 all docs will
have a good scrub before release.