Can't publish readme-burning-iso to docs for Fedora 18 to docs website

[Paul W. Frields]

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 06:32:53PM -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2013 5:28 PM, <sparks at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 06:22:56PM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 18:10 -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:11:39PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:23:58AM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:53:04AM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 09:43 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, tiansworld
> > > > > > > > <tiansworld at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I forgot to mention that this git clone is needed for
> cloning the
> > > > > > > > > readme-burning-iso git repo for publishing the doc.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That page is fairly old. I've never needed the doc utils to
> publish
> > > > > > > > Burning ISOs.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > More than "fairly" old.  fedora-docs-utils was used prior to
> Publican.
> > > > > > > Somewhere around Fedora 10 or 11 we converted all the documents
> to
> > > > > > > Publican.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Agreed.  This is why the Trac instances for docs is bad.  Too much
> > > > > > old "common" data gets posted and never updated.
> > > > >
> > > > > ACK:
> > > > >
> https://fedorahosted.org/readme-burning-isos/wiki/WikiStart?action=history
> > > > >
> > > > > That WikiStart page hasn't been updated in years.  But any FAS user
> > > > > can update it, so I encourage someone to modify it as necessary, no
> > > > > sacred cows.
> > > >
> > > > Paul: Is there any reason to keep the Trac instance at all?  Perhaps
> now would be a good time to terminate these instances and just maintain the
> regular wiki.  AFAIK, no one is using the ticketing systems or any other
> piece of Trac.
> > >
> > > Or maybe replace everything on the trac with links to BZ
> >
> > Well, there is more than BZ that would need to be linked to.  IMO, just
> getting rid of the Trac instances would be far less confusing and less
> stuff to maintain (for us and for Infrastructure).
> >
> > - --Eric
> 
> I'm all for dumping trac, since we don't use it.   There are some valuable
> contribution guidelines I'd like to pull into the Documentation Guide
> first, though.

Ditto here.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com