On the localization infrasturcutre of the Docs project

[Eric Christensen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/28/2013 01:25 PM, sankarshan wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Dimitri Glezos
> <glezos at transifex.com> wrote:
>> Have the costs of having two separate platforms been carefully & 
>> openly weighted by the L10n community? Has it discussed,
>> requested and approved the usage of another platform?
> 
> I'm a bit lost here - do components which are part of Fedora
> receive a mandate to not choose any infrastructure other than
> those hosted/supported by Fedora ?

AFAIK, there is no mandate.  That said, by scattering the work around
to different systems, translators have a more difficult time trying to
find what needs to be done.  It's more efficient to have a single
location to work from, IMO.  It's also simpler from the Docs end so we
don't have so many tools to use to pull in the translations.

- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=nsXa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----