bootloader or boot loader I got me my answer

Leslie S Satenstein lsatenstein at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 15 02:47:48 UTC 2013


When in doubt, hyphenate

bootloader  can be boot-loader.

Google has bootloader, wikipedia has boot loader


Here is my take. And I may be as wrong as anyone else.

A bootloader is the name of the software, which, when executing, performs the function of loading the boot code, hence 

when executing, it is in the role of a boot loader.

So, a bootloader is a boot loader.



 
Regards 

 Leslie

Mr. Leslie Satenstein
An experienced Information Technology specialist.
Yesterday was a good day, today is a better day,
and tomorrow will be even better.lsatenstein at yahoo.com
alternative: leslie.satenstein at gmail.com 
SENT FROM MY OPEN SOURCE LINUX SYSTEM.





>________________________________
> From: Pete Travis <me at petetravis.com>
>To: For participants of the Documentation Project <docs at lists.fedoraproject.org> 
>Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 5:38 PM
>Subject: Re: bootloader or boot loader
> 
>
>
>
>On Jun 14, 2013 3:37 PM, "Pete Travis" <me at petetravis.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 14, 2013 3:03 PM, "Eric H. Christensen" <sparks at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA512
>> >
>> > Can someone confirm whether it is bootloader or boot loader?  What's the standard for Fedora guides?
>> >
>> > - -- Eric
>> >
>> > - --------------------------------------------------
>> > Eric "Sparks" Christensen
>> > Fedora Project - Red Hat
>> >
>> > sparks at redhat.com - sparks at fedoraproject.org
>> > 097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2  E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
>> > - --------------------------------------------------
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
>> >
>> > iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJRu2RbAAoJEB/kgVGp2CYvxGYL/j++ldSxO+54S179iWSpILcu
>> > isZ7xXXRGpBO07QT+qV+m0UV82oUSWdKsylu+aOSXwzBG54QMBe7sHZ0f/F/2pZU
>> > cp3QuEmnpksVOgjKirbONFx3XmrpbiZgZ27COwuoPKr+Cupwfx0eIkBhSnbMSq4m
>> > R5tYDdtXmzy/QZtx2spu02QlFyCwC/cgOok0a+xVeN3rDG9lsDQKV+D6Vc9sU9jV
>> > xW7y5xtjBeM8W+Zhfv5MJm5T+ZrCha5RyiGHtwyOH9gZCL0CjtlbMvbyNtCBLf0y
>> > FgFCT4pQ87OahChrG2a9eDb1DRXAOwfThpfzsHBJq70/RZDjeMyYx2H28kL8629g
>> > 7XHEUbHQfhsja6nxcbNqC9S+FjM+0BDP7113MVgw9hGb6BpwLW9lNbjVY1YG1RjQ
>> > C/oTdEXNfDz+7qel/Ibiwuwi/ucHSpPZsGiJ8sHoiXhfG94HWNjdu88c1ekhaxF9
>> > FhlUiOLlZQoY5lvzwz10Fa8XArBGar65PK+h3RWlpQ==
>> > =thpt
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > --
>>
>> I just skimmed over the grub manual(1) for hints. There are eight instances of "bootloader" and forty instances of "boot loader" - so there's a trend but nothing absolute.
>>
>> Without looking for further precedent, I like "bootloader". It is a discrete concept, and IMO worthy of its own compound word. It doesn't work either way in a literal sense, and to the uninitiated "boot loader" could just as well be something at the Wolverine factory as something that loads [the booting of] an operating system. A "bootloader" is clearly not an incidental pairing of words and therefore provides better connotation for the reader.
>>
>> That said, I'm not going to argue if there's an established precedent.
>>
>> --Pete
>Oops.... 
>(1) http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html
>-- 
>docs mailing list
>docs at lists.fedoraproject.org
>To unsubscribe:
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20130614/a6a5bfe9/attachment.html>


More information about the docs mailing list