Final release notes for Fedora 20

Pete Travis me at petetravis.com
Fri Nov 29 17:54:08 UTC 2013


On Nov 29, 2013 11:16 AM, "Jérôme Fenal" <jfenal at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2013/11/29 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com>:
> > On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:24 +0100, Jérôme Fenal wrote:
> >> 2013/11/28 Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com>:
> >> > Hi, folks. We have a final release requirement for the release notes:
> >> >
> >> > "The final branded release notes must be present on release-blocking
> >> > images and the appropriately versioned generic release notes must be
> >> > available in the release repository."
> >> >
> >> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Final_Release_Criteria#Release_notes
> >> >
> >> > That means we need the final fedora-release-notes package to be built
> >> > and submitted as an update ASAP: we're in the middle of building
Final
> >> > TCs ATM, and Go/No-Go is next Thursday. Next Tuesday is really the
> >> > deadline to have all the stuff we need for Final built.
> >> >
> >> > I've filed a bug and nominated it as a release blocker to track this:
> >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035531 .
> >>
> >> Hi Adam,
> >>
> >> Does this include translations?
> >
> > That's, uh, actually a good question, but not one I really know the
> > answer to. From my side the process looks like this: "bug docs team
> > until they submit an update which they say is the final
> > fedora-release-notes package, get an image built with that package in
> > it, check that the 'Release Notes' menu entry opens something that looks
> > like release notes and doesn't have unicorns drawn all over it, DONE!"
>
> The French version of the release notes could be finished for next
Tuesday.
> Just asking to know who to ping when done and proofread.
>
> --
> Jérôme Fenal
> --
>

Updating the rpm is a matter of testing build, committing and tagging in
the source repo, bumping package spec, and pushing the update. I check tx
status when doing it, but you can ping the list as needed.  I wouldn't
object to adding co-maintainers, though.

I'll be doing a review for final later, when not on the road. I can dig up
the procedural doc I made for the process then, if anyone is interested.

--Pete
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20131129/1074ed6f/attachment.html>


More information about the docs mailing list