New member
Leslie S Satenstein
lsatenstein at yahoo.com
Mon Aug 25 23:10:20 UTC 2014
Regards
Leslie
Mr. Leslie Satenstein
SENT FROM MY OPEN SOURCE LINUX SYSTEM.
>________________________________
> From: Eric Griffith <egriffith92 at gmail.com>
>To: For participants of the Documentation Project <docs at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:35 PM
>Subject: Re: New member
>
>
>On 8/25/2014 2:47 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
>> On 08/24/2014 12:35 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
>>> Sorry about the delay on this response guys, this week has been the
>>> "Lets get moved into college!" week so: busy busy busy.
>> Exciting! I'm glad you're making time to participate, but of course
>> school comes first.
>>
>> One minor nitpick, and I won't bring it up again: The convention with
>> mailing lists is to either respond to things inline, like I'm doing
>> here, or to place your full reply below the post you are responding
>> to. It's easier to make sense of a message to read chronologically,
>> rather than read a response then read the message that prompted it
>> after. Not a big deal here, but on some lists you *will* get
>> lectured, every time.
>Whoopsies! Is this better? Don't want to be accidentally making a faux pas!
>
>>> I'd have no problem working on the F21 release notes, though one page
>>> I did see that could use some love is actually the wiki page for
>>> joining a Fedora SIG
>>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG). There's nothing
>>> majorly wrong with it, just two things I noticed:
>>>
>>> 1) The artwork on there (no offense meant to Nitesh Narayan Lal)
>>> seems to be using an older version of the Fedora Mascot (Panda? Polar
>>> Bear? Teddy Bear? I never figured out what the mascot was, to be
>>> honest), which makes it look off compared to the artwork on say...
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/en/download-splash
>>>
>>> 2) Vertically done images that waste content-space, where a
>>> horizontal image set would have fit perfectly.
>>>
>>> Now, I'm not claiming to be some great artist or anything like that.
>>> But I can play around with the images in gimp a bit, or if someone
>>> can point me in the direction of the artist that DID the download
>>> splash mascot images I can talk to them and see if they can do
>>> updated-versions of the Join_SIG page.
>>>
>> The "Fedora Join SIG" is a specific group that works to help welcome
>> new contributors and find a place for them, and assist other groups in
>> refining their onboarding process. The page is targeted towards
>> people that want to join that group - not really people that want to
>> join the project in general. A lot of wiki pages end up like that;
>> 'internally facing' content whose scope isn't quite clear unless you
>> know the story behind it.
>>
>> An FAS account with a contributor agreement gives you wiki privileges,
>> so you can edit that page to make it more clear. Do be cognizant of
>> the purpose of the page, though, and communicate with those involved
>> to let them know about your work. For the most part, I'd encourage
>> you to be bold and edit freely and responsibly. In this case, since
>> the page represents a group, it would be a good idea to reach out to
>> them for anything beyond minor edits. There's a fedora-join mailing
>> list, if you want to really dig in there.
>>
>> The design team does a lot of the artwork you find scattered around
>> Fedora's sites. I believe they have general design rules and they'd
>> probably help with source files if you wanted to work that way, or
>> they would probably humor requests if you have a project with graphic
>> design needs. For more authoritative information, you should reach
>> out to the design team. I'm sure you'd be welcome there, too.
>Oh! Okay! I didn't realize that the page was the specific domain of its
>own dedicated SIG. I might play around a little bit but I'll try to not
>step on anyone's toes. I'll fire off a few emails to the lists and just
>post a heads up. As I said, it was just one thing that struck me as
>"odd" or "out of place" when I was combing through the wiki pages on
>contributing.
>
>>> Now onto Pete's question...
>>>
>>> How many SIG leaders sit on the forums? Or at least check in? The
>>> ones that do... If you see someone posting a lot of good content do
>>> you reach out to them and offer them to join the SIG? For the Docs
>>> group I would suggest watching for good tutorials, howto's,
>>> troubleshooting steps, etc.
>> I skim post titles and some content to figure out what the prevalent
>> issues are from time to time, but rarely participate. I've seen Rahul
>> Sundaram there, a longtime contributor, and sometimes Adam
>> Williamson. I know a few folks like Leigh Scott have transitioned to
>> sharing their efforts with the wider Fedora community. Otherwise-
>> *shrug* - you were being rhetorical, right? :)
>
>For the most part, yes, I was being rhetorical. Rahul and I have talked
>briefly on the Phoronix forums, Adam and I a bit more (didn't realize
>Adam was so young haha).
>
>My perspective on these messages and topic might need a bit explaining:
>I pretty much use 2 distros when it comes to Linux.... Fedora and Arch.
>Its no secret in the Linux community that Arch probably has the best
>wikis and documentation that are available, better in some ways than
>Gentoo. Not all of its good, but a lot of it is very on-point. If you
>are looking for content writers, people who are taking the time to write
>guides and howto's, the forums might be a good place to check.
>>
>> Like I said, it's an area of the community that Docs doesn't really
>> participate in. I'm sure there are a lot of effective tutorials
>> there, and I suspect there are just as many things that I wouldn't
>> feel comfortable recommending to users. Frankly, it gets to be a lot
>> to sift through - and for me, when faced with the choice between
>> keeping up with a meandering 10+ page forum thread and investing the
>> same time into working on documentation that addresses the same
>> problem without discussion, I'm going to be looking for the most
>> effective return (for everyone) on time invested. It's a personal
>> preference, really. It sounds like you like participating there, and
>> that's great. If you're interested, *you* could be the guy on the
>> Docs team that's watching the forums for good content and gathering
>> feedback on our drafts.
>
>You bring up a good point about following threads gets to be a pain, I
>completely agree. But if you happen to see the same name pop up again
>and again, someone who is doing good quality work on a consistent
>basis... A quick private message saying "Hey, I see you doing good work.
>The Docs team could use you, even if you just copy-paste the guides to
>the Wiki." You might get a new Docs team member out of it. On the same
>angle, the person sending the message doesn't have to be -You-
>specifically, I would be more than happy to keep my eye on the forums
>for those who are posting good content, as I enjoy the "social" aspect
>of the forums.
>
>>> Why are the forums unofficial to begin with? Why is it
>>> forums.fedoraforums.org <http://forums.fedoraforums.org> and not
>>> forums.fedoraproject.org <http://forums.fedoraproject.org>? Users
>>> will use the forums. Users will LOOK for forums for help, not mailing
>>> lists. Mailing lists are good for developers-- people who are
>>> constantly involved with the project. Forums are one-shot affairs,
>>> they ask a question they get an answer, they don't come back until
>>> they have another problem. OR.. Forums are used by those trying to
>>> target the one-shot users. The ones who are writing tutorials and
>>> howto's, the ones who are looking out for the beginner users. Why are
>>> they on the forums? Because they know their audience. They know the
>>> target of their writings are not on the mailing lists, they are on
>>> the forums.
>> I disagree here. People go to the forums because they are looking for
>> a social experience. They don't want to dig through documentation to
>> learn the whole system, they want a personalized answer to the
>> specific problem at hand. The documentation we work on doesn't
>> provide an interactive experience like that, and it doesn't always
>> provide ordered instructions for the user's set of tasks for the day -
>> but for the most part, all the answers *are* there for the taking.
>> Forums and mailing lists provide the crucial role of helping people
>> understand how to fit all the pieces together. The difference between
>> the two delivery methods is largely personal preference.
>>> How much of the Fedora design process is done in the open on the
>>> forums? I'm thinking of KDE's recent push with the Visual Design
>>> Group. A lot of work is happening and being talked about on blogs and
>>> such, but a lot is also happening in the Visual Design Group's
>>> dedicated forums. They are engaging users where the users are, and
>>> they are getting feedback. Sure, sometimes this feedback is just
>>> "Yay" or "Nay" but sometimes this feedback is in the form of a
>>> counter-proposal. That person, the one who just drew up a
>>> counter-proposal, they just got introduced to and dipped their feet
>>> into Visual Design. Never know, might inspire them to help out and
>>> contribute more often.
>>
>>>
>>> The metaphor and relationship I was trying to create isn't perfect
>>> between the Fedora's Doc SIG and KDE's VDG, but I hope I made my
>>> point with how much of a mirror there could be.
>>
>> Little to none of Fedora's decision making process takes place on
>> fedoraforums.org . We're all part of the greater Fedora community, but
>> that 's a third party site dedicated to user support. Everything that
>> happens in Fedora is done completely in the open, mailing lists are
>> archived, meetings are logged, discussions are public, announcements
>> provided. Transparency is a *big* priority within Fedora. The
>> delivery method isn't what some might prefer, but there are *lots* of
>> active forums in many languages around the world, and distributing
>> these discussions among them would be a huge effort. It's much more
>> practical to have all this going on in one place. There's some work
>> being done to provide a more forum-like gateway to these discussions
>> that Mairin Duffy has been tracking on her blog[1].
>>
>> The difference might be that opportunities to make improvements are
>> just as open. It's easy to say "You should do this differently," but
>> not so easy to say "I will make this better," and follow through.
>> Those of us who are 'officially' contributing have made that
>> commitment, and we're glad to see you among us.
>
>Oh of course, its far harder for someone to actually step up and try to
>make things better. I will definitely check into Mairin's blog, it
>sounds like a very interesting project.
>
>Out of pure curiosity, I know the forums are third party... but why? Why
>were they never made official? Fedora's got the wiki, the docs, the
>mailing lists, irc, Fedora planet... but not forums? Just seems like an
>odd base to not have covered I suppose.
>
>Not sure if my previous message came through, but does anyone know why
>the Documentation link on planet.fedoraproject.org is a dead link?
>
> -- Eric --
>
> Leslie here
>
>My view is that the mailing list is not as good as a forum, but should summarize what was discussed on a forum.
>It is in most aways less friendly, as one could miss an email, or have it land in the SPAM folder or whatever. With forums, we can raise comments and obtain a larger source of volunteers. We could even dish out work in small portions and then get someone to consolidate the results. It also allows one to rework what someone wrote, so as to have it more easily read and understood.
>Another benefit of forums, is the speed of response, which is one thing that we struggle with by using chat or emails.
>
>One of my pet peeves is the writing style, that irks me. I try to call my writing style slang free and based on facilitating the text translation to French or English.
>
>As I see it, the author writes some text, and even if it is rough, it is accepted as is.
>I always tried to convey to my IT students that the should present their writing to their significant partner, to see if the writing is lucid.
>
>The preferred use of a forum is more productive than trying to get particpants around the globe together at one time for an IRC chat. My peers in Australia and New Zealand are up to 13 hours difference from my local time.
>
>Is there something along the forum lines that can be done for Fedora 22?
>
>Leslie Satenstein
>Montreal
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20140825/670161c0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the docs
mailing list