[Fedora-electronic-lab] TAPR Open Hardware License
Shakthi Kannan
shakthimaan at gmail.com
Sat Dec 12 16:57:53 UTC 2009
Hi,
--- On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH
<chitlesh at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
| * From a fedora software packaging point of view
|
| We have to ensure that these cores can either be compiled with
| iverilog or ghdl. A script or Makefile should be shipped with the rpm.
\--
Yes, we will ship only those that work with FEL tools.
---
| All proprietary scripts should be in docdir of a subpackage -extra.
\--
We shouldn't ship proprietary scripts that don't have the sources or
are not under a free/open software/hardware license.
---
| The advantage of packaging these cores is that once we got one core
| fully packaged, others will have the same template and it will be very
| smooth.
\--
Agreed.
---
| We should only compile those cores which are tagged as done/complete.
| Those cores without documentation are pretty useless for the user. So
| I would say we should prioritize those having documentation.
\--
Ok. Could you point me to where I can find documentation on the
workflows provided in FEL?
Thanks,
SK
--
Shakthi Kannan
http://www.shakthimaan.com
More information about the electronic-lab
mailing list