Governance vs. Charter

[Honza Horak]

On 11/07/2013 05:15 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> I'd rather vote about members after some period. Let's say we need a
> year to start the initiative. After a year half of us could be replaced
> by other members of group. All members of WG could vote about it. Only
> half should be replaced, because at least half of members should be
> aware of what was happening past 6 months.
>
> The reason for election is that our group stick to some technologies
> which might become obsoleted. We wouldn't be so usefull as we were and
> new guys should take charge.

Replacing a half of the people sounds very reasonable; that should 
ensure good compromise between a need of fresch ideas and continuity.

> Even if our group is small now, it might be an obstacle in work of other
> WG.

Sorry, I didn't get that one :) Could you be a bit more specific what 
obstacles did you mean, please?

Honza