Governance vs. Charter

[Deborah Rieden]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tadej Janež" <tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si>
> To: "Fedora Environment and Stacks Working Group mailing list" <env-and-stacks at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 7:27:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Governance vs. Charter
> 
> I agree with those of you who said Toshio's draft is very good.

I also agree.

> 
> Regarding the voting, I'm also in favour of requesting a new trac
> instance and tracking our votes there.

This is a good idea.  Having a designated place to find what was 
proposed and how it was voted on is important.  Especially when you 
need to go back and review it.  It's a better mechanism than email.

> Regarding the duration of the terms and the process of choosing new
> members, I suggest that the initial WG members serve at least for a year
> to form the initial "what this WG is doing" document and do some
> concrete work (e.g. implement something from this document) to put up
> some precedences for the future. Then I would follow Marcela's
> suggestion to only re-elect half of the WG members at a time, so we can
> guarantee some continuity.

This sounds good to me.

Debi

> 
> Best regards,
> Tadej
> 
> _______________________________________________
> env-and-stacks mailing list
> env-and-stacks at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks
> 

-- 
Debi Rieden
Engineering Program Manager
(Developer Toolset (DTS), Software Collections (RHSCL), LPC Pilot and some other projects)
Westford (2S719)
Office: 978-392-1023; Cell 617-669-2934
drieden at redhat.com
#devtoolset, #boston, #software-collections