Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? (was: Re: Meeting minute from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-15))

[Honza Horak]

On 04/15/2014 04:22 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> ============================================
> #fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-04-15)
> ============================================
>
>
> Meeting started by mmaslano at 12:01:12 UTC. The full logs are available
> at
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-04-15/env-and-stacks.2014-04-15-12.01.log.html
>
> .
>
>
>
> Meeting summary
> ---------------
> * init process  (mmaslano, 12:01:30)
>    * LINK:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Enable_Software_Collections
>
>      (jreznik, 12:10:17)
>
> * Playground repository  (tjanez, 12:32:45)
>    * LINK: https://github.com/fedora-haskell/common/blob/master/common.mk
>      very low-tech :)  (juhp, 13:53:18)
>    * ACTION: hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions
>      about deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground
>      and will send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list
>      to continue  (hhorak, 14:04:32)

Added to open questions:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draft%29#Open_Questions

And these are actually the comments from today's meeting worth keeping 
in mind:
* people install packages and later then we are not able to find the 
source for those packages
* disc space for copr builds is very limited
* rawhide deletes old builds as well but we can always find the source 
in dist-git (not possible in copr)
* keeping only srpms could be enough (for me personally it seems like 
the compromise)
* we're not sure if deleting packages in playground would violate GPL 
(legal list CC'd and the question could be -- "Is it violation of GPL if 
we offer RPMs and SRPMs at some point and delete them after some time?" 
-- now it seems like common scenario, happening every day, but rather 
asking to be sure)

Regards,
Honza

>    * We may follow the Workstation group's "Proposed System Wide Change:
>      Workstation: Enable Software Collections" and discuss it on the
>      devel list  (hhorak, 14:12:48)
>    * mirek-hm talked about "dnf playground enable" which would enable all
>      copr repos in playground  (hhorak, 14:15:59)
>    * We talked about scenario that playground would be implemented by
>      "copr with playground flag" + "dnf plugin working with such corps".
>      No voting done. No final decisions.  (hhorak, 14:19:57)
>
> Meeting ended at 14:21:35 UTC.
>
>
>
>
> Action Items
> ------------
> * hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions about
>    deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground and will
>    send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list to continue
>
>
>
>
> Action Items, by person
> -----------------------
> * hhorak
>    * hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions about
>      deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground and
>      will send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list to
>      continue
> * **UNASSIGNED**
>    * (none)
>
>
>
>
> People Present (lines said)
> ---------------------------
> * juhp (122)
> * mmaslano (66)
> * hhorak (47)
> * tjanez (43)
> * mirek-hm (26)
> * jreznik (13)
> * drago01 (6)
> * jwb (5)
> * zodbot (4)
> * Southern_Gentlem (4)
> * pkovar (2)
> * bkabrda (0)
> * samkottler (0)
> * abadger1999 (0)
> * drieden (0)
>
>
>
>
> Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
>
> .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
>
> _______________________________________________
> env-and-stacks mailing list
> env-and-stacks at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks