half baked idea for further baking: "fedora-ugly" repo

Miroslav Suchy msuchy at redhat.com
Thu Feb 13 19:23:51 UTC 2014

On 02/13/2014 08:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> It's not trivial, but it doesn't require either of those things. I think a
> signing server with less security than Sigul would be adequate, or else a
> Sigul instance with more relaxed policies.

Rather no signing at all than less secure signing.


More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list