Playground Repo Requirements Document

Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano at
Wed Feb 26 15:40:40 UTC 2014

On 02/25/2014 07:23 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Okay, I started a requirements document for the playground repository:
> There's three things that we need to do with this to make it useful for FESCo:
> 1) Add other things we need to decide on to the Open Questions.  We
> especially need things that will affect the work needed to implement
> the repository but we can decide which things those are later.
> 2) Decide which features from the Open Questions we want to apply to
> the Playground repository.  Update the description section as we make
> decisions.
> 3) Analyze what will be needed to implement the features we've decided
> the Playground repository needs to have and fill in the Identified
> Needs sections with that information.
> -Toshio
> _______________________________________________
> env-and-stacks mailing list
> env-and-stacks at
Thanks for the draft. I left comments to some points, but I'd rather 
discuss it on next meeting, but because you probably won't be there...

My opinions on Open Questions:
* signing - sure we need to sign (copr requirement)
* I would prefer rolling updates and no testing repository. It's 
Playground, bugs can be there.
* I don't know what's mirrormanager. Mirroring to all Fedora mirrors? I 
guess we don't need it at start.
* self hosting - no, I guess we don't have to ship BuildRequires in 
Playground repo. It can do shipping of some packages easier.
* no reviews! It should be quick and easy. Maybe someone else than owner 
of copr repo should approve new projects, which will go into Playground. 
Maybe cla+1 could mean automatic push into Playground if user click on 
button Playground.


More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list