Playground Repo Requirements Document

Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotnicky at redhat.com
Thu Feb 27 14:26:58 UTC 2014


On Thu 27 Feb 2014 01:53:06 PM CET Marcela Mašláňová wrote:

> On 02/26/2014 06:54 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> The Conflicts and replace comments.  I thought it had been decided that
>> conflicts and replacements should not be allowed.  If that wasn't
>> a decision we should probably kick those choices back down to the open
>> questions.  I've done so now and we can discuss that on the Open Questions
>> part of this thread/the next meeting.
>>
>> -Toshio
>>
> You are right we reached some conclusion on conflicts and replace, but
> what if we want for example new v8? We have terribly old v8 in current
> Fedora and conflicts might be a good solution in this case.

This would be just a simple update. No conflicts required if I am not
mistaken right?

--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Developer Experience

PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/attachments/20140227/9760ee5e/attachment.sig>


More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list