Playground Repo Requirements Document

Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano at
Thu Feb 27 14:36:25 UTC 2014

On 02/27/2014 03:26 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Thu 27 Feb 2014 01:53:06 PM CET Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> On 02/26/2014 06:54 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>> The Conflicts and replace comments.  I thought it had been decided that
>>> conflicts and replacements should not be allowed.  If that wasn't
>>> a decision we should probably kick those choices back down to the open
>>> questions.  I've done so now and we can discuss that on the Open Questions
>>> part of this thread/the next meeting.
>>> -Toshio
>> You are right we reached some conclusion on conflicts and replace, but
>> what if we want for example new v8? We have terribly old v8 in current
>> Fedora and conflicts might be a good solution in this case.
> This would be just a simple update. No conflicts required if I am not
> mistaken right?
> --
> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at>
> Software Engineer - Developer Experience
> PGP: 7B087241
> Red Hat Inc.                     
It depends what we want. Maybe updates are fine if users know Playground 
means your system could be updated more than you thought.


More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list