Polishing the PRD

Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou at pingoured.fr
Thu Jan 9 09:32:34 UTC 2014


On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:20:58AM -0500, Sam Kottler wrote:
> > On 01/08/2014 07:33 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:46:17PM +0100, Tadej Jane┼ż wrote:
> > >> 4) CI
> > >> * Out of scope (going to take a long time to be included in Fedora,
> > >> maybe even the inclusion for this group).
> > >> ** AutoQA - co-operation with Fedora QA.
> > >> ** Jenkins - upstream projects for Fedora should use
> > >> http://jenkins.cloud.fedoraproject.org/
> > >
> > > I would greatly appreciate if that 'should use' was changed into a 'can
> > > use'.
> > > Jenkins as part of the infra was set up because we, the infra, wanted to
> > > have
> > > something to do CI (see warning [1]). We have offered/are offering it to
> > > other projects but it's
> > > on a best-effort basis and in fact we do run quite often into some problems
> > > when
> > > running the updates.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Jenkins@infra#What_is_Jenkins_.40_Fedora-infra.3F
> > >
> > I don't know much about Jenkins and I don't want to push projects to use
> > Jenkins if they are already using something else. So, how to put it?
> > Could you formulate it better?
> 
> I think we can rephrase this to something like "Encourage upstream projects to move toward a continuous integration model, and potentially allowing them to use the Fedora jenkins instance to move in that direction" or something along those lines.
> 
> Thoughts?

Nicer than what I just sent :)

Pierre


More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list