Some questions about Playground Repo
tadej.janez at tadej.hicsalta.si
Tue Mar 18 10:50:03 UTC 2014
On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 13:57 -0400, Deborah Rieden wrote:
> After reading through the playground repository draft  I thought it would be helpful to have tooling which can display the contents and status of the playground repo.
Overall, I agree that it would be very useful to have such tooling.
First thing that came to my mind was that we would want something
similar to the Fedora packages , just that it would be tailored to
the Playground repository. Or maybe, in the future, Fedora packages
could handle both, packages in the main repository and packages in the
> For example:
> - Display who owns the package, if a provenpackager a special symbol is displayed?
I've just added an open question to the Playground repository draft
about whether there will there be co-maintainers, provenpackagers in the
> - Is the package signed? If not signed do we want to state why? Do we want to include a link to request
> that this package be considered for signing?
I think signing should be implemented on the repository level, i.e.
either we'll have all of the packages signed or none will be signed.
> This information should be viewable by anyone? Any restrictions?
I see no need for any restrictions.
> Any comments?
The nice thing about a web tool like you suggested is that it could be
developed incrementally and in parallel to building other infrastructure
of the Playground repository.
More information about the env-and-stacks