Open Questions - Playground: reviews

Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano at
Wed Mar 26 21:21:13 UTC 2014

On 03/26/2014 05:17 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 15:11 -0400, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> Will there be any review of COPRs/packages that will become part of the
>> Playground repository?
>> Proposal:
>> Let's add a button 'Raise legal flag' or used this button from Copr page.
> I disagree. Surely we want to review the packages that will become part
> of the Playground repository? Otherwise, how are we going to reach the
> goal of creating a middle ground between current main repo and COPRs?
> We should define a small policy/guidelines for the Playground repository
> that all the packages will have to adhere to and then develop
> (semi)automated way to check and enforce it.
> This will be a much faster and light-weight review than the current
> manual review process, but it will still allows us to provide packages
> of higher quality that those from some "random" COPRs.
> Tadej
> _______________________________________________
> env-and-stacks mailing list
> env-and-stacks at
Do you have more concrete proposal? What should we exactly check?


More information about the env-and-stacks mailing list